"This article written by Paul Graham in 2017 discusses the value of general and surprising insights. He often notes that people usually have information that is either general but not surprising (such as clichés) or surprising but not general (like gossip). However, Graham points out that the most valuable ideas tend to be both general and surprising. While he acknowledges that pursuing such ideas can be difficult, he argues that overcoming this challenge is very valuable. He emphasizes the importance of developing your own ideas and not being afraid to repeat yourself in the process.

---

# General and Suprising (The Value of General and Surprising Information: Thoughts on Innovation)

September 2017

The most valuable insights are both general and surprising. F = ma for example. But general and surprising is a hard combination to achieve. That territory tends to be picked clean, precisely because those insights are so valuable.

Ordinarily, the best that people can do is one without the other: either surprising without being general(e.g. gossip),  or general without being surprising(e.g. platitudes).

Where things get interesting is the moderately valuable insights. You get those from small additions of whichever quality was missing. The more common case is a small addition of generality: a piece of gossip that's more than just gossip, because it teaches something interesting about the world. But another less common approach is to focus on the most general ideas and see if you can find something new to say about them. Because these start out so general, you only need a small delta of novelty to produce a useful insight.

A small delta of novelty is all you'll be able to get most of the time. Which means if you take this route, your ideas will seem a lot like ones that already exist. Sometimes you'll find you've merely rediscovered an idea that did already exist. But don't be discouraged. Remember the huge multiplier that kicks in when you do manage to think of something even a little new.

Corollary: the more general the ideas you're talking about, the less you should worry about repeating yourself. If you write enough, it's inevitable you will. Your brain is much the same from year to year and so are the stimuli that hit it. I feel slightly bad when I find I've said something close to what I've said before, as if I were plagiarizing myself. But rationally one shouldn't. You won't say something exactly the same way the second time, and that variation increases the chance you'll get that tiny but critical delta of novelty.

And of course, ideas beget ideas.(That sounds familiar.) An idea with a small amount of novelty could lead to one with more. But only if you keep going. So it's doubly important not to let yourself be discouraged by people who say there's not much new about something you've discovered. ""Not much new"" is a real achievement when you're talking about the most general ideas.

It's not true that there's nothing new under the sun. There are some domains where there's almost nothing new. But there's a big difference between nothing and almost nothing, when it's multiplied by the area under the sun.

---

Relevant Keywords: value of insights, general and surprising insights, novelty in ideas, rediscovering ideas, repeating ideas, importance of novelty, generality in ideas, idea development, new ideas under the sun"